Identifiez-vous
Pseudo
Mot de passe
Mot de passe oublié?
Devenez membre
Déposez vos documents
Index
Alphabétique
Par matière
Par sous-matière
Par année
Par etablissement
TOP
Les mieux évalués
Les plus téléchargés
Les plus consultés
Meilleurs auteurs
Meilleurs établissements
Ethic dimension and decision making in crisis and war
8 pages / 3,50 crédits / 0 téléchargements
Auteur: Guillaume Lacaille
Evaluation: Pas d'évaluation (0 vote)
Document en ligne depuis le 31/08/2003 dans :
Sciences politiques, sociologie >Relations internationales
Article  écrit le 24/01/2003 dans l'établissement University of Georgetown
Langue: Anglais
Niveau: Postgraduate (6 années d'études et +)
hits: 79
Extrait
Among the few compelling explanations of what constitutes a bad or good choice in the field of decision-making, the proposition of Gary Klein seems particularly significant. Klein assumes that a decision is proved to be poor when its author regrets the way he made it rather than its outcome. He argues “that a person will consider a decision to be poor if the knowledge gained would lead to a different decision if a similar situation arose”. This clear-cut suggestion appears to imply that an effective decision making process should lead naturally toward a satisfactory conclusion when uncontrollable factors such as misfortune, ignorance or overwhelming opposition are absent. Nevertheless, the Rwandan tragedy of 1994 casts a shadow on Klein’s proposition. In this occasion, Washington did not suffer from bad luck or uncertainty. By using his framework, the only fact that most subsequent policy-makers have agreed to assert that the Clinton administration’s course of action should have been different involves that its decision-making process was ineffective.
Télécharger le document
| More



Flux Rss
Rubriques

Mots clés

Partenaires
Shvoong.com
Repro-tableaux.com
MIT OpenCourseWare
Merlot.org
Google Scholar
Accueil Matières Nouveautés Présentation du service Devenez Membre Contact Info auteur Info Chercheur